← All articles

Which AI is actually good at building presentations?

“Use AI for slides” is not one workflow. Some tools write copy. Some scaffold whole mini-apps. Some edit files in your repo. The useful question is which assistant matches the task you are on right now.

Cursor — best when you live in a repo

Cursor shines when the deck is a folder of HTML, CSS, and JS and you want the agent to create files, run npm run build, fix 404s, and iterate in place. It reads your project, respects skills you install, and keeps context across a long session. Weak spot: it is overkill if you only need bullet points for a board memo.

Pick Cursor when: you are shipping an interactive web deck, repackaging for Superprez, or wiring GitHub push → live update.

Claude — best for structure and tone

Claude is strong at narrative arc, tightening prose, and proposing where interactivity helps without cluttering every slide. Claude Code (desktop/CLI) can own a repo like Cursor; on the web it is better for outlining and reviewing than for running local servers.

Pick Claude when: you need a credible first draft of story flow, speaker notes, or a critique of an existing deck outline.

ChatGPT — best for fast drafts and mixed media

ChatGPT is still the default for “make me 12 slides about X” with fast turnaround, image ideas, and table/chart suggestions. Canvas mode helps when you want iterative edits on one document. It is less dependable for production-grade HTML unless you stay in the loop on file structure and test in a browser.

Pick ChatGPT when: speed matters more than repo hygiene, or non-technical teammates need a friendly interface.

Copilot & Gemini — best inside their gardens

Copilot inside Microsoft 365 is hard to beat if the deliverable must land in PowerPoint and SharePoint. Gemini inside Google Workspace fits the same pattern for Slides and Docs. Both are weaker if your target is a standalone interactive URL you can share outside that suite.

Pick them when: the organization standard is PPT/Slides and IT will not approve another host.

A workflow that survives handoff

  1. Outline and claims in Claude or ChatGPT (audience + decision).
  2. Build HTML shell + interactive slides in Cursor with your repo open.
  3. Package and verify locally; upload to Superprez for a live link.
  4. Share view-only with executives; invite collaborators who edit with their own AI.

That last step is where tools diverge. Slide exports die in inboxes. A Superprez deck stays one URL, versioned in Git, updatable on push—whether the editor was Cursor, Claude, or a human in VS Code.

Related